🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised parents to block their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic statement calling for a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a useful foundation," said a leading MEP driving the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "supported by robust evidence".

Previously, support built behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization set up by the family of a teenager who died after encountering disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are appropriate and suitable for young users," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, action is mostly unfolding at the state level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills requiring guardian approval for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond the West, other nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations adopt a more measured position. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

Even as this international debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and others indicate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.